Skip to main content

About Twitter Profile Labels

Twitter uses visual identity signals like labels and badges on account profiles to help distinguish between various account types and to give more context about them. While some of these labels are generated by Twitter, others are the result of user activity. Here is a list of the labels and badges that are frequently seen on account profiles. Applied Profile labels by Twitter Checkmark in Blue The blue checkmark can indicate one of two things: either that a user's account has been verified according to Twitter's previous verification standards (active, notable, and authentic), or that the user has an active subscription to Twitter Blue, the company's new subscription service that launched on iOS on November 9, 2022. The active, notable, and authentic criteria that were applied in the previous process will not be reviewed for accounts that receive the blue checkmark as part of a Twitter Blue subscription. Here is more information about the blue checkmark. Gold Checkmark The

Describe a recession. Wikipédia is undecided

The Biden administration's insistence that the U.S. economy has not entered an economic slump prompted a frenzy of alterations to Wikipedia's definition for "recession," but the entry has now been put on hold.

This week, unauthorised additions were made to Wikipedia by new users. The updates sparked an editing war that compelled registered volunteer editors to constantly undo changes in order to adhere to the site's principles, which in this case called for correct reference and no political prejudice.


Wikipedia's "edit warring" policy encourages disputing editors to settle their differences through discussion on a discussion page. The glut of new editors disregarded that best practise and continued to push questionable edits, forcing more seasoned editors to disable the freedom to edit.

According to Wikipedia, the page is temporarily "semi-protected" until August 3 and no new or unregistered users are permitted to update it.


Top officials in the Biden administration discount talk of a recession.


The economy fell at an annual pace of 0.9 percent in the April–June quarter, according to data released by the Commerce Department on Thursday. This was the second consecutive quarter with a negative GDP, or gross domestic product. Many people view a consecutive decline in GDP as an unofficial indicator for a recession.

President Biden had argued that low unemployment rates, record job growth, and foreign corporate investment indicated a thriving economy days before the release of the most recent economic indicators.

Janet Yellen, the secretary of the Treasury, refrained from using the R-word during a recent interview on NBC's Meet the Press. Although a recession is typically defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth, she asserted, "When you're producing approximately 400,000 jobs a month, that is not a recession."

A July 21 memo from the White House referred to the NBER as the "official recession scorekeeper," citing the NBER as the standard definition of a recession as "a major decrease in economic activity that is spread across the economy and that lasts more than a few months."

It was anticipated that the GDP report would reveal a negative number. Unregistered individuals circumvented Wikipedia's editing procedures in the days before the data release to make edits that highlighted a more specific definition of recession. The "two consecutive quarters of negative GDP" criterion was highlighted by the modifications.

The claims made by senior Biden officials regarding the various indicators of economic health were in conflict with those edits.

 

A surge of unauthorised Wikipedia edits disproved claims made by the administration.

 

There are many definitions of a recession on the Wikipedia article.
However, a user changed the first sentence of the entry on Monday, adding the following sentence: "Economists normally consider two consecutive quarters of decreasing GDP a recession."


Contrary to the standards of the platform, neither a citation nor a description of that language were included in the Wiki article's main text. It was also an odd inclusion because it came before a phrase that was already in the copy and expressly defined "negative economic growth for two consecutive quarters" for the United Kingdom. 

According to longstanding volunteer Wikipedia editor Ryan McGrady, it was the first change in the editing controversy. He has been keeping up with the controversy, although not being actively involved in the recent action on the recession page.

He explained to NPR via Twitter direct message that "unregistered users continually tried to increase the visibility of the 'two consecutive quarters' definition in ways that weren't consistent with Wikipedia's principles." "Perhaps it was an effort to paint the words made by the administration in an unfavourable light, or perhaps it was just someone who saw Wikipedia didn't match what they were hearing on the news and tried to correct it in good faith. Perhaps even an economist thought the article was lacking. The unknown.

Nevertheless, stating that "economists often consider" is a broad statement that, in accordance with Wikipedia policy, required strong supporting evidence, and as with any Wikipedia article, it needed to be put to the page's body before being included in the lead.

Registered users retracted the modification and those like it for those reasons, in addition to alleging problems with political bias, before ultimately shutting the page.

Additionally, changes that have subsequently been undone aligned with the Biden administration's definition of a recession, whether on purpose or not.

Nevertheless, stating that "economists often consider" is a broad statement that, in accordance with Wikipedia policy, required strong supporting evidence, and as with any Wikipedia article, it needed to be put to the page's body before being included in the lead.

Registered users retracted the modification and those like it for those reasons, in addition to alleging problems with political bias, before ultimately shutting the page.

Additionally, changes that have subsequently been undone aligned with the Biden administration's definition of a recession, whether on purpose or not.

Wikipedia editors come to a consensus

Making the same edit several times without first seeking agreement on the Talk page, a forum located within each topic article where editors can discuss changes, is contrary to the convention followed by the Wikipedia editing community, as stated by McGrady.

Until such a consensus arises, it's critical to "err on the side of the status quo version for contentious matters," he continued.

The current version of the recession page on Wikipedia, which is protected from rogue edits, was created after experienced editors came to some agreement on certain phrases: "Although the definition of a recession varies between different countries and scholars, two consecutive quarters of decline in a country's real gross domestic product (real GDP) is commonly used as a practical definition of a recession."

Previous iterations of the "recession" entry can be seen in the revision history, as is the case with all Wikipedia pages.

The "recession" page has now been updated, and the disclaimer at the top of the website informs visitors that certain media outlets have shared an outdated version of it that "claimed to be its current status."

Please verify that any statements or screenshots you have seen are accurate by comparing them to the content of this page.

Editor's note: This article has been updated to include important information on the significant changes made to the "recession" page on Wikipedia. This article previously concentrated on the Wikipedia revisions that seemed to support the Biden administration. The report has been amended to include a mention of the Wikipedia edit by a brand-new user that started the "recession" page editing conflict.

Source: NPR

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On October 1, 2022, Facebook Live Shopping will be ended.

You won't be able to arrange or host any new live shopping events on Facebook after October 1, 2022. Although you won't be able to make product playlists or tag goods in your Facebook Live videos, you can still utilise the service to broadcast live events. We are focusing more on Reels on Facebook and Instagram, Meta's short-form video product, as consumer viewing habits change to short-form video. Use Reels and Reels advertisements on Facebook and Instagram to experiment with reaching and engaging people through video. To facilitate further exploration and deliberation, you can also tag products in Reels on Instagram. Facebook Live Shopping  You can set up live shopping on Instagram if you have a store with a checkout and wish to hold live shopping events there. You can download your video from your Page or Creator Studio if you want to keep a previously live video.   Source: Meta Business Help Centre

Cinderella Was Not Invented by Disney!

Century-long narratives from numerous cultures are woven together to create the real Cinderella.   You're familiar with Cinderella. You do, of course. She is a character we learn about through osmosis because she is a part of the cultural ether. Princess that she is. She is decked out in a lovely dress, glass shoes, long white gloves, and a shiny headband. To meet and dance with a very handsome prince and get home before the clock strikes midnight and her carriage turns back into a pumpkin, she overcomes the hardship of her evil stepmother and stepsisters, who treat her like their maid.  However, that isn't the true Cinderella. That is the Cinderella from the 1950 animated film and the recent remake that is currently playing in theatres. Not everyone can agree on who the real Cinderella is. She is a figure who connects the majority of human cultures and centuries of storytelling. And occasionally, her lost slipper isn't even made of glass. Greeks were the first Cinderellas.

James Cameron make Avatar: The Way of Water

It’s been 13 long years since Avatar—or any other film directed by James Cameron—debuted on the big screen. Hollywood has transformed since then: In 2009, Blockbuster hadn’t even declared bankruptcy yet. Since then, Disney has acquired 20th Century Fox, the studio that financed the first Avatar movie; expensive action films without superheroes now rarely get the green light, unless they star Tom Cruise; and streaming has crippled the movie theatre business. Yet Avatar remains the highest-grossing movie in history. When Avengers: Endgame briefly ascended to that top spot in 2020, Cameron launched a re-release of Avatar in China to recapture the title. It worked: The film has now grossed $2.9 billion in total. The director has long planned to make several sequels, but each year, when Disney would announce its upcoming slate, they’d add an addendum that the Avatar followups had been delayed yet again. Fans started to question whether Avatar 2, much less Avatar 3, 4, or 5, would ever be re